Course Outline

segmentGetting Started (Don't Skip This Part)

segmentStatistics and Data Science: A Modeling Approach

segmentPART I: EXPLORING VARIATION

segmentChapter 1  Welcome to Statistics: A Modeling Approach

segmentChapter 2  Understanding Data

segmentChapter 3  Examining Distributions

segmentChapter 4  Explaining Variation

segmentPART II: MODELING VARIATION

segmentChapter 5  A Simple Model

5.6 DATA = MODEL + ERROR: Notation

segmentChapter 6  Quantifying Error

segmentChapter 7  Adding an Explanatory Variable to the Model

segmentChapter 8  Models with a Quantitative Explanatory Variable

segmentPART III: EVALUATING MODELS

segmentChapter 9  Distributions of Estimates

segmentChapter 10  Confidence Intervals and Their Uses

segmentChapter 11  Model Comparison with the F Ratio

segmentChapter 12  What You Have Learned

segmentFinishing Up (Don't Skip This Part!)

segmentResources
list Introduction to Statistics: A Modeling Approach
5.6 DATA = MODEL + ERROR: Notation
Now let’s see how mathematical notation is used to represent the simple (empty) model we introduced before. We have introduced the overarching concept that DATA = MODEL + ERROR. In our simple model, we are using one number, the mean, to model the distribution of scores.
We could represent this model in a word equation like this:
THUMB DATA = MEAN + ERROR
But there are some real advantages to rewriting this statement in mathematical notation. Here’s one form this notation might take:
\[Y_{i}=\bar{Y}+e_{i}\]
This equation literally represents what we were doing with R before. It tells us that each value of Y in our data (\(Y_{i}\)) can be seen as the sum of two parts: the mean of all values of Y (\(\bar{Y}\), our MODEL), and its deviation from the mean (\(e_{i}\), or ERROR). If we add these two numbers together for a specific score, we will get the original score. Very simple, very concrete.
Going back to DATA = MODEL + ERROR, you might also see a version that looks like this:
\[Y_{i}=\hat{Y}_{i}+e_{i}\]
\(\hat{Y}\) (pronounced Yhat) means “the predicted value of Y.” You could also think of it as the “model’s value for Y.” So, this equation simply states that each value of Y can be seen as the sum of its predicted value based on the model, and its deviation from that predicted value.
In our tiny data set, for example, student #1 had a thumb length of 56. So, \(Y_{1}=56\). Under our simple model we used the mean as the predicted value for all students, so \(\hat{Y}_{1}=\bar{Y}=62\). So, \(e_{1}\) would have to be 6 to make the equation true—the exact value of the residual for student #1.
As we develop more complex models we still will end up with a single predicted value of Y for each score based on our model. But we will predict this value using more than just the mean.
Notation for the General Linear Model
Finally, we complicate things a little more, introducing one more form of our DATA = MODEL + ERROR formulation called the General Linear Model (GLM) notation:
\[Y_{i}=b_{0}+e_{i}\]
This is a more abstract version of the equation above; we have substituted \(b_{0}\) (we read this as “b sub 0”) for the mean, \(\bar{Y}\). Don’t be concerned if this doesn’t make complete sense—this is one of those things that will take time to understand. The main thing to know for now is that \(b_{0}\) can represent the mean, but it doesn’t have to.
For our simple model (the empty model) it represents the mean. But for other models, and other situations, it can represent other values. For example, if our outcome variable were categorical, the interpretation of \(b_{0}\) would need to be adjusted to be the mode, which is the best single predictor of the next observation’s value on a categorical variable.
Indeed, this flexibility is what makes the General Linear Model general. Whenever you see a GLM model statement, you should think carefully about what, in the particular situation, each symbol represents.